The Compare Subjects tool takes a root subject and up to ten others, researches each one against your stated use case, and returns a structured comparison report with per-subject scores and a dimension-by-dimension breakdown. Useful for hiring decisions, partnership evaluation, investor due diligence, and competitive intelligence.
Each subject is researched using their existing dossier data when available, falling back to real-time research. The 30 comparison dimensions are scored and then mapped to five bucket scores: professional track record, communication and influence, technical or domain depth, leadership and execution, and market position. Each subject receives a composite FoxScore from 0 to 100 alongside the individual dimension breakdown.
Comparison uses cases are declared upfront so the analysis is framed correctly:
Compare a root person against 1 to 10 others. Research draws from person dossier data, public professional history, and web search. Produces a ranked comparison table with per-person FoxScore and dimension-level findings. Use case: co-founder evaluation, board candidate shortlisting, executive hire decisions.
Compare 2 to 3 companies across 12 entity-shaped sections including ownership, leadership, market position, financial signals, and strategic trajectory. Research uses public filings, the company website, and structured web search. Use case: M&A target evaluation, competitive threat mapping, partnership candidate shortlisting.
For people: supply the names of the subjects, the use case, and optionally an existing research dossier or prior enrichment. For companies: supply company names and optionally domain names, plus the use case.
Outputs:
Comparisons are saved and shareable via a public report link. The shared report shows the same breakdown without requiring the viewer to have a MentionFox account.
Compare Subjects is callable via the MentionFox API and as an MCP tool. The MCP tool name is compare_subjects. See Integrations for connection instructions.