Home › funding signals › Glade Brook Private Investors XXXVII LP › competitors

Competitors and similar companies

Glade Brook Private Investors XXXVII LP's competitors and similar companies

The 5 nearest raises on the records held here, in the same industry group (Private Equity Fund), side by side with Glade Brook Private Investors XXXVII LP.

Back to the full Glade Brook Private Investors XXXVII LP record.

$200.50M

of raises in its group are smaller

Against the 53 raises on file in Private Equity Fund. Median $6.28M, largest $25.85B.

Offering size, this raise against its peers

CB Offshore Credit Opportunities Fund IV, LP

$322.45M

Marblegate Partners Onshore Fund III, L.P.

$214.45M

Glade Brook Private Investors XXXVII LP

$200.50M

Siguler Guff Global Emerging Markets Growth Opportunities Fund II (A), LP

$185.37M

H.I.G. Realty Partners V (Onshore), L.P.

$165.36M

LC Vero Fund II LLC

$82.69M

Bars are to scale against $322.45M, the largest of the six. The dotted line is the median of all 53 raises on file in Private Equity Fund. Amounts are what each filing states as sold, or as the total offering where nothing is recorded sold yet.

Company	On the record	Industry group	Filed
Marblegate Partners Onshore Fund III, L.P.	$214.45M	Private Equity Fund	2026-09-03
Siguler Guff Global Emerging Markets Growth Opportunities Fund II (A), LP	$185.37M	Private Equity Fund	2026-09-03
H.I.G. Realty Partners V (Onshore), L.P.	$165.36M	Private Equity Fund	2026-09-03
LC Vero Fund II LLC	$82.69M	Private Equity Fund	2026-09-03
CB Offshore Credit Opportunities Fund IV, LP	$322.45M	Private Equity Fund	2026-09-04
Glade Brook Private Investors XXXVII LP (this page)	$200.50M	Private Equity Fund	2026-09-04

Click a column heading to sort. Comparison is against records held here, not against every raise that exists. A raise with no stated amount shows as "Not stated" rather than as zero.

How this list is chosen

Nearest by stated offering size, inside the industry group the filing itself declares (Private Equity Fund). Nothing is inferred about what a company does.

Comparison is against records held here, not against every raise that exists. Figures are read directly from the source record; names have not been matched against other people.